{"id":8082,"date":"2011-05-15T04:03:22","date_gmt":"2011-05-15T09:03:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/?p=8082"},"modified":"2018-12-15T13:38:37","modified_gmt":"2018-12-15T17:38:37","slug":"the-relative-masses-of-a-proton-and-electron","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/the-relative-masses-of-a-proton-and-electron\/","title":{"rendered":"The relative masses of a proton and electron"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-family: arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\">We have shown throughout\u00c2\u00a0this blog there would be many theoretical advantages to defining space in terms of a continuous non-quantized field of energy\/mass and four *spatial* dimensions instead of four dimensional space-time.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">One is that it would allow one to understand why a proton and an election have different masses even though the absolute magnitude of their charge is the same in terms of the laws of classical three-dimensional space. <\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">In the article &#8220;<\/span><a title=\"Permalink to : Why is energy\/mass quantized?\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/?p=17\" rel=\"bookmark\"><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial; color: #0080ff;\">Why is energy\/mass quantized?<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">&#8221; Oct. 4, 2007 it was showed one can derive its quantum mechanical properties by extrapolating the laws of classical resonance in a three-dimensional environment to a matter wave in a continuous non-quantized field of energy\/mass moving on a &#8220;surface&#8221; of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">(Louis de Broglie was the first to predict the existence of a continuous field of energy\/mass when he theorized that all particles had a wave component.\u00c2\u00a0 His theories were confirmed by the discovery of electron diffraction by crystals in 1927 by Davisson and Germer.)<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">Briefly it showed the four conditions required for resonance to occur in a classical three-dimensional environment, an object, or substance with a natural frequency, a forcing function at the same frequency as the natural frequency, the lack of a damping frequency and the ability for the substance to oscillate spatial would occur in one consisting of four *spatial* dimensions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">The existence of four *spatial* dimensions would give a matter wave the ability to oscillate spatially on a &#8220;surface&#8221; between a third and fourth *spatial* dimension thereby fulfilling one of the requirements for classical resonance to occur.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">These oscillations would be caused by an event such as the decay of a subatomic particle or the shifting of an electron in an atomic orbital.\u00c2\u00a0 This would force the &#8220;surface&#8221; of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension to oscillate with the frequency associated with the energy of that event.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">However, the oscillations caused by such an event would serve as forcing function allowing a resonant system or &#8220;structure&#8221; to be established in a continuous field of energy\/mass.\u00c2\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">Classical mechanics tells us the energy of a resonant system can only take on the discrete quantized values associated with its resonant or a harmonic of its resonant frequency. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">The article &#8220;<\/span><a title=\"Permalink to : Why is energy\/mass quantized?\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/?p=17\" rel=\"bookmark\"><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial; color: #0080ff;\">Why is energy\/mass quantized?<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">&#8221; showed why these resonant systems in four *spatial* dimensions are responsible for the discrete quantized energies associated with protons and electrons.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium;\"><span style=\"font-family: arial;\">However, one can also use the above concept of four *spatial* dimensions to understand the physical boundaries <\/span><span style=\"font-family: arial;\">of a proton and electron. <\/span><span style=\"font-family: Arial;\">\u00c2\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"font-family: arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\">In classical physics, a point on the two-dimensional surface of paper is confined to that surface.\u00c2\u00a0 However, that surface can oscillate up or down with respect to three-dimensional space.\u00c2\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"font-family: arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\">Similarly an object occupying a volume of three-dimensional space would be confined to it however, it could, similar to the surface of the paper oscillate \u00e2\u20ac\u0153up\u00e2\u20ac\u009d or \u00e2\u20ac\u0153down\u00e2\u20ac\u009d with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"font-family: arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\">The confinement of the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153upward\u00e2\u20ac\u009d and \u00e2\u20ac\u0153downward\u00e2\u20ac\u009d oscillations of a three-dimension volume with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension is what defines the spatial boundaries associated with a particle in the article \u00e2\u20ac\u0153<\/span><\/span><a title=\"Permalink to : Why is mass and energy quantized?\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/?p=17\" rel=\"bookmark\"><span style=\"font-family: arial; color: #0080ff;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\">Why is energy\/mass quantized?<\/span><\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-family: arial;\"><span style=\"font-size: medium;\">\u00e2\u20ac\u0153<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">(The internal structure of quarks, a fundament component of particles was derived in the article &#8220;<\/span><a title=\"Permalink to : The geometry of quarks\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/?p=1321\" rel=\"bookmark\"><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial; color: #0080ff;\">The geometry of quarks<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">&#8221; Mar. 15, 2009 in terms of an interaction between a continuous energy\/mass component of space and the geometry of four *spatial* dimensions.)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">Meanwhile in the article &#8220;<\/span><a title=\"Permalink to : The reality of the fourth *spatial* dimension\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/?p=5619\" rel=\"bookmark\"><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial; color: #0080ff;\">The reality of the fourth *spatial* dimension<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">&#8221; Dec. 1, 2010 it was shown that one can derive all forms of energy including gravity in terms of a displacement or curvature in a &#8220;surface&#8221; of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">This curvature is analogous to the space-time curvature &#8220;The General Theory of Relativity&#8221; hypothesized is responsible for gravitational energy.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">One advantage, as will be shown below to defining the universe in terms of four *spatial* dimensions is that allows for a bidirectional spatial movement of a &#8220;surface&#8221; of a three-dimensional space manifold whereas defining it in terms of four dimensional space-time does not.\u00c2\u00a0 This is because one can move in two directions up or down, forwards or backwards in a spatial dimension but in only one direction, forward in a time dimension.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">For example in the article &#8220;<\/span><a title=\"Permalink to : Electromagnetism in four *spatial* dimensions\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/?p=14\" rel=\"bookmark\"><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial; color: #0080ff;\">Electromagnetism in four *spatial* dimensions<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">&#8221; Sept. 27, 2007 showed one can derive the polarity and absolute magnitude of the charge on a proton and electron in terms of a bidirectional displacement of a &#8220;surface&#8221; of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">It derived the positive charge of a proton in terms of a &#8220;downward&#8221; displacement\u00c2\u00a0 in a &#8220;surface&#8221; of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension.\u00c2\u00a0 While the negative the charge of an electron will be derived in terms of oppositely directed &#8220;upward&#8221; displacement in that surface.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">One can understand how these displacements would define their electrical properties by extrapolating the laws of classical mechanics of displacements in water to it.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">Classical mechanics tell us that if one lifts a bucket full of water or pushes down on an empty one a force will be developed that will cause the bucket raised above or the one that was pushed down below its surface to move or become &#8220;attracted&#8221; to its surface.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">Similarly if one lifts or pushed down on a &#8220;surface&#8221; of three-dimensional space manifold a force will be developed that will cause the raised or depressed regions to become attracted to its surface.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">Therefore, one could derive why the unlike charges attract each other in terms of a classical mechanism if one assumes that they are a result oppositely directed of a displacement\u00c2\u00a0 in a &#8220;surface&#8221; of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension.\u00c2\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">Additional classical mechanics also tells us there is a direct relationship between the magnitudes of a displacement in the surface of water to the magnitude of the energy resisting that displacement. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">For example the force resisting the further displacement of an empty bucket in water is directly related to the depth of that displacement. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">This defines why like charges repel each other because the displacement in a &#8220;surface&#8221; of a three-dimensional space manifold caused by two similar charges will be greater than that caused by a single one.\u00c2\u00a0 Therefore, similar charges will repel each other because the magnitude of the energy resisting the displacement will be greater for two identical charges than it would be for a single charge. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">The mechanism responsible for generating this movement was defined in the article &#8220;<\/span><a title=\"Permalink to : The reality of the fourth *spatial* dimension\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/?p=5619\" rel=\"bookmark\"><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial; color: #0080ff;\">The reality of the fourth *spatial* dimension<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">\u00e2\u20ac\u009d were it was shown when mass is converted to energy or energy to mass, the &#8220;surface&#8221; of a three-dimensional space manifold either &#8220;expands&#8221; or &#8220;contracts&#8221; with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension.\u00c2\u00a0 This would result in the movement of that &#8220;surface&#8221; respect to it.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">The effects these movements have on the density of continuous energy\/mass component of the resonant systems that defined the quantum mechanical properties of a proton and electron in the article &#8220;<\/span><a title=\"Permalink to : Why is energy\/mass quantized?\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/?p=17\" rel=\"bookmark\"><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial; color: #0080ff;\">Why is energy\/mass quantized?<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">&#8221; are analogous to the effects high and low pressure areas in the earth&#8217;s atmosphere have on density of air molecules.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">In a high-pressure area, the energy of air molecules is directed downwards towards the surface of the earth.\u00c2\u00a0 This results in the density of the air molecules at the apex of a high-pressure area to be greater than their density in the volume of air adjacent to it.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">Conversely, in a low-pressure area the energy of the air molecules is directed upward away from the surface of the earth which results in their density at the apex of a low-pressure area to be less than the density of the air molecules in the volume of air adjacent to it.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">A similar effect would occur in space with respect to the density of their continuous energy\/mass component<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">In a dimensional \u00e2\u20ac\u0153high-energy volume\u00e2\u20ac\u009d associated with the positive charge of a proton, the energy of the continuous energy\/mass component of space would be directed \u00e2\u20ac\u0153downward\u00e2\u20ac\u009d with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension, towards the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153surface\u00e2\u20ac\u009d of a three-dimension space manifold.\u00c2\u00a0 This results in its density in the resonant system of a proton to be greater relative to its density in the volume adjacent to it.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">This is analogous to how the air molecules at the apex of a high-pressure area in the earth&#8217;s atmosphere would be denser than the air molecules in the volume of air adjacent to the apex of a high-pressure area.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">Conversely in a dimensional \u00e2\u20ac\u0153low-energy volume\u00e2\u20ac\u009d associated with the negative charge of an electron, the energy of the continuous energy\/mass component of space would be directed \u00e2\u20ac\u0153upward\u00e2\u20ac\u009d with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension, away from the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153surface\u00e2\u20ac\u009d of a three-dimension space manifold.\u00c2\u00a0 This results in its density in the resonant system of an electron to be less relative to its density in the volume adjacent to it.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">Therefore, the density of the continuous energy\/mass component of the resonant system of a proton will be greater than that of an electron even though the absolute magnitude electrical energy or charge is the same. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">This is analogous to why the density of air molecules in a high-pressure area is greater that in a low-pressure area even though the magnitude of their energy is same but oppositely directed.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">In the article &#8220;<\/span><a title=\"Permalink to : Gravity and electromagnetism linked in four *spatial* dimensions\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/?p=32\" rel=\"bookmark\"><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial; color: #0080ff;\">Gravity and electromagnetism linked in four *spatial* dimensions<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">&#8221; Dec 14, 2007 it was shown that the mass of a particle or object is directly related to the density or concentration of the continuous field of energy\/mass contained in the volume of a particle or object.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">Therefore because the density, as mentioned earlier of the continuous non-quantized field of energy\/mass is greater in a proton than that of an electron its mass will also be greater than that of an electron. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">This shows that one of the theoretical advantages to define the space in terms of a continuous field of energy\/mass and four *spatial* dimensions instead of four dimensional space time is that it would allow one to understand why the relative mass of a proton is greater than that of an electron even though the absolute magnitude of their charge is the same by extrapolating the laws of a classical environment to four *spatial* dimensions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"font-size: medium; font-family: arial;\">Later Jeff<\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\">Copyright Jeffrey O&#8217;Callaghan 2011<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We have shown throughout\u00c2\u00a0this blog there would be many theoretical advantages to defining space in terms of a continuous non-quantized field of energy\/mass and four *spatial* dimensions instead of four dimensional space-time. One is that it would allow one to understand why a proton and an election have different masses even though the absolute magnitude &#8230; <a title=\"The relative masses of a proton and electron\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/the-relative-masses-of-a-proton-and-electron\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about The relative masses of a proton and electron\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[21,57,22],"tags":[20,636,638,364,411,351,494,412,350,289,343,440,634,500,635,302,637],"class_list":["post-8082","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-theroetical","category-particle-physics","category-the-unexplained","tag-quantum-mechanics","tag-absolute-magnitude","tag-air-molecules","tag-classical-resonance","tag-davisson","tag-davisson-and-germer","tag-electron-diffraction","tag-germer","tag-louis-de-broglie","tag-quantum-mechanical","tag-resonance","tag-resonant-systems","tag-the-general-theory-of-relativity","tag-theoretical-advantages","tag-theory-of-relativity","tag-three-dimensional-space","tag-unlike-charges-attract"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.6.1 (Yoast SEO v27.6) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The relative masses of a proton and electron | Unifying Quantum and Relativistic Theories<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/the-relative-masses-of-a-proton-and-electron\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The relative masses of a proton and electron\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"We have shown throughout\u00c2\u00a0this blog there would be many theoretical advantages to defining space in terms of a continuous non-quantized field of energy\/mass and four *spatial* dimensions instead of four dimensional space-time. One is that it would allow one to understand why a proton and an election have different masses even though the absolute magnitude ... Read more\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/the-relative-masses-of-a-proton-and-electron\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Unifying Quantum and Relativistic Theories\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-05-15T09:03:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-15T17:38:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"jeffocal\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@imagine_reality\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@imagine_reality\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"jeffocal\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.theimagineershome.com\\\/blog\\\/the-relative-masses-of-a-proton-and-electron\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.theimagineershome.com\\\/blog\\\/the-relative-masses-of-a-proton-and-electron\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"jeffocal\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.theimagineershome.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cf9118fe812178b7079a6de527d3591d\"},\"headline\":\"The relative masses of a proton and electron\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-15T09:03:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-15T17:38:37+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.theimagineershome.com\\\/blog\\\/the-relative-masses-of-a-proton-and-electron\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1738,\"commentCount\":0,\"keywords\":[\"3. Quantum Theory\",\"absolute magnitude\",\"air molecules\",\"classical resonance\",\"Davisson\",\"Davisson and Germer\",\"electron diffraction\",\"Germer\",\"Louis de Broglie\",\"quantum mechanical\",\"resonance\",\"resonant systems\",\"The General Theory of Relativity\",\"theoretical advantages\",\"Theory of Relativity\",\"three-dimensional space\",\"unlike charges attract\"],\"articleSection\":[\"2. Theoretical\",\"4. Paritcle phsysics\",\"6. The Unexplained\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.theimagineershome.com\\\/blog\\\/the-relative-masses-of-a-proton-and-electron\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.theimagineershome.com\\\/blog\\\/the-relative-masses-of-a-proton-and-electron\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.theimagineershome.com\\\/blog\\\/the-relative-masses-of-a-proton-and-electron\\\/\",\"name\":\"The relative masses of a proton and electron | Unifying Quantum and Relativistic Theories\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.theimagineershome.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-15T09:03:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-15T17:38:37+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.theimagineershome.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cf9118fe812178b7079a6de527d3591d\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.theimagineershome.com\\\/blog\\\/the-relative-masses-of-a-proton-and-electron\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.theimagineershome.com\\\/blog\\\/the-relative-masses-of-a-proton-and-electron\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.theimagineershome.com\\\/blog\\\/the-relative-masses-of-a-proton-and-electron\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.theimagineershome.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The relative masses of a proton and electron\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.theimagineershome.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.theimagineershome.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"Unification of Quantum Mechanics with Relativity\",\"description\":\"The universe&#039;s most powerful enabling tool is not\u00a0knowledge or understanding but imagination because it extends the reality of\u00a0one&#039;s environment.\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.theimagineershome.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.theimagineershome.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cf9118fe812178b7079a6de527d3591d\",\"name\":\"jeffocal\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f424fb2e5c59914150fbf4067763093ef8601c2d183c7bf3326bd4066883bee1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f424fb2e5c59914150fbf4067763093ef8601c2d183c7bf3326bd4066883bee1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f424fb2e5c59914150fbf4067763093ef8601c2d183c7bf3326bd4066883bee1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"jeffocal\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The relative masses of a proton and electron | Unifying Quantum and Relativistic Theories","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/the-relative-masses-of-a-proton-and-electron\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The relative masses of a proton and electron","og_description":"We have shown throughout\u00c2\u00a0this blog there would be many theoretical advantages to defining space in terms of a continuous non-quantized field of energy\/mass and four *spatial* dimensions instead of four dimensional space-time. One is that it would allow one to understand why a proton and an election have different masses even though the absolute magnitude ... Read more","og_url":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/the-relative-masses-of-a-proton-and-electron\/","og_site_name":"Unifying Quantum and Relativistic Theories","article_published_time":"2011-05-15T09:03:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-15T17:38:37+00:00","author":"jeffocal","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@imagine_reality","twitter_site":"@imagine_reality","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"jeffocal","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/the-relative-masses-of-a-proton-and-electron\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/the-relative-masses-of-a-proton-and-electron\/"},"author":{"name":"jeffocal","@id":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/cf9118fe812178b7079a6de527d3591d"},"headline":"The relative masses of a proton and electron","datePublished":"2011-05-15T09:03:22+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-15T17:38:37+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/the-relative-masses-of-a-proton-and-electron\/"},"wordCount":1738,"commentCount":0,"keywords":["3. Quantum Theory","absolute magnitude","air molecules","classical resonance","Davisson","Davisson and Germer","electron diffraction","Germer","Louis de Broglie","quantum mechanical","resonance","resonant systems","The General Theory of Relativity","theoretical advantages","Theory of Relativity","three-dimensional space","unlike charges attract"],"articleSection":["2. Theoretical","4. Paritcle phsysics","6. The Unexplained"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/the-relative-masses-of-a-proton-and-electron\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/the-relative-masses-of-a-proton-and-electron\/","url":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/the-relative-masses-of-a-proton-and-electron\/","name":"The relative masses of a proton and electron | Unifying Quantum and Relativistic Theories","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-05-15T09:03:22+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-15T17:38:37+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/cf9118fe812178b7079a6de527d3591d"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/the-relative-masses-of-a-proton-and-electron\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/the-relative-masses-of-a-proton-and-electron\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/the-relative-masses-of-a-proton-and-electron\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The relative masses of a proton and electron"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/","name":"Unification of Quantum Mechanics with Relativity","description":"The universe&#039;s most powerful enabling tool is not\u00a0knowledge or understanding but imagination because it extends the reality of\u00a0one&#039;s environment.","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/cf9118fe812178b7079a6de527d3591d","name":"jeffocal","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f424fb2e5c59914150fbf4067763093ef8601c2d183c7bf3326bd4066883bee1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f424fb2e5c59914150fbf4067763093ef8601c2d183c7bf3326bd4066883bee1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f424fb2e5c59914150fbf4067763093ef8601c2d183c7bf3326bd4066883bee1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"jeffocal"}}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8082","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8082"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8082\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8082"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8082"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8082"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}