{"id":7697,"date":"2011-03-20T04:55:02","date_gmt":"2011-03-20T09:55:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/?p=7697"},"modified":"2020-02-27T07:43:45","modified_gmt":"2020-02-27T11:43:45","slug":"reality-and-the-epr-paradox","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/reality-and-the-epr-paradox\/","title":{"rendered":"The Reality behind the EPR Paradox"},"content":{"rendered":"

We have shown through the\u00c2\u00a0this blog and its companion book “<\/span>The Reality of the Fourth spatial dimension<\/span>” there are would be many theoretical advantages to defining the universe in terms of four *spatial* dimensions instead of four dimensional space-time. <\/span><\/p>\n

One is that it would allow to understand why it is not necessary to assume there must be \u00e2\u20ac\u0153<\/span>hidden variable” that would allow Quantum Mechanics to become a complete theory of nature in order to maintain the classical concepts of separability<\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n

In 1935, Einstein co-authored a paper with Podolsky\u00e2\u20ac\u201cRosen<\/em> which came to be called the EPR Par<\/em>adox.\u00c2\u00a0 <\/strong>Its intent was to show that Quantum Mechanics could not be a complete theory of nature.\u00c2\u00a0 The first thing to notice is that Einstein was not trying to disprove Quantum Mechanics in any way.\u00c2\u00a0 In fact, he was well aware of its power to predict the outcomes of various experiments.\u00c2\u00a0 What he was trying to show was that there must be a “hidden variable” that would allow Quantum Mechanics to become a complete theory of nature <\/span><\/p>\n

The argument begins by assuming that there are two systems, A and B (which might be two free particles), whose wave functions are known.\u00c2\u00a0 Then, if A and B interact for a short period of time, one can determine the wave function which results after this interaction via the Schr\u00c3\u00b6dinger equation or some other Quantum Mechanical equation of state.\u00c2\u00a0 Now, let us assume that A and B move far apart, so far apart that they can no longer interact in any fashion.\u00c2\u00a0 In other words, A and B have moved outside of each other’s light cones and therefore are spacelike separated.<\/span><\/p>\n

With this situation in mind, Einstein asked the question: what happens if one makes a measurement on system A?\u00c2\u00a0 Say, for example, one measures the momentum value for it.\u00c2\u00a0 Then, using the conservation of momentum and our knowledge of the system before the interaction, one can infer the momentum of system B.\u00c2\u00a0 Thus, by making a momentum measurement of A, one can also measure the momentum of B.\u00c2\u00a0 Recall now that A and B are spacelike separated, and thus they cannot communicate in any way.\u00c2\u00a0 This separation means that B must have had the inferred value of momentum not only in the instant after one makes a measurement at A, but also in the few moments before the measurement was made.\u00c2\u00a0 If, on the other hand, it were the case that the measurement at A had somehow caused B to enter into a particular momentum state, then there would need to be a way for A to signal B and tell it that a measurement took place.\u00c2\u00a0 However, the two systems cannot communicate in any way!<\/span><\/p>\n

If one examines the wave function at the moment just before the measurement at A is made, one finds that there is no certainty as to the momentum of B because the combined system is in a superposition of multiple momentum eigenstates of A and B.\u00c2\u00a0 So, even though system B must be in a definite state before the measurement at A takes place, the wave function description of this system cannot tell us what that momentum is!\u00c2\u00a0 Therefore, since system B has a definite momentum and since Quantum Mechanics cannot predict this momentum, Quantum Mechanics must be incomplete.<\/span><\/p>\n

In response to Einstein’s argument about incompleteness of Quantum Mechanics, John Bell derived a mathematical formula that quantified what you would get if you made measurements of the superposition of the multiple momentum eigenstates of two particles.\u00c2\u00a0 If local realism was correct, the correlation between measurements made on one of the pair and those made on its partner could not exceed a certain amount, because of each particle’s limited influence.<\/span><\/p>\n

In other words he showed there must exist inequities in the measurements made on pairs of particles that cannot be violated in any world that included both their physical reality and their separability because of the limited influence they can have on each other when they are “spacelike” separated.<\/span><\/p>\n

When Bell published his theorem in1964 the technology to verify or reject it did not exist.\u00c2\u00a0 However in the early 1980s, Allen Aspect performed an experiment with polarized photons that showed that the inequities it contained were violated. <\/span><\/p>\n

This meant that science has to accept that either the reality of our physical world or the concept of separability does not exist.<\/span><\/p>\n

Many would prefer to assume the separability defined by Newtonian physics does not exist instead of reality of our particle world because without that “reality” Einstein and many others believe science would have little meaning.<\/span><\/p>\n

However in the article \u00e2\u20ac\u0153<\/span>The *reality* of quantum probabilities<\/span><\/a>\u00e2\u20ac\u009d\u00c2\u00a0 it was shown the probability functions quantum mechanics associates the wave function of a particle is a result of a matter wave moving on a “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension. <\/span><\/p>\n

Very briefly the article “<\/span>Why is energy\/mass quantized?<\/span><\/a>” Oct. 4, 2007 showed that one can derive the quantum mechanical properties energy\/mass by extrapolating the laws of classical resonance to a matter wave in a continuous non-quantized field of energy\/mass moving on a “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension. <\/span><\/p>\n

(Louis de Broglie was the first to predict the existence of a continuous form of energy\/mass when he theorized all particles have a wave component.\u00c2\u00a0 His theories were confirmed by the discovery of electron diffraction by crystals in 1927 by Davisson and Germer.)<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

It showed the four conditions required for resonance to occur in a classical environment, an object, or substance with a natural frequency, a forcing function at the same frequency as the natural frequency, the lack of a damping frequency and the ability for the substance to oscillate spatial would be meet in one consisting of a continuous non-quantized field of energy\/mass and four *spatial* dimensions.<\/span><\/p>\n

The existence of four *spatial* dimensions would give a matter wave the ability to oscillate spatially on a “surface” between a third and fourth *spatial* dimensions thereby fulfilling one of the requirements for classical resonance to occur.<\/span><\/p>\n

These oscillations would be caused by an event such as the decay of a subatomic particle or the shifting of an electron in an atomic orbital.\u00c2\u00a0 This would force the continuous non-quantized field of energy\/mass to oscillate with the frequency associated with the energy of that event.<\/span><\/p>\n

However, the oscillations caused by such an event would serve as forcing function allowing a resonant system or “structure” to be established in it.<\/span><\/p>\n

These resonant systems are responsible for the quantum mechanical properties energy\/mass. <\/span><\/p>\n

In earlier article “<\/span>Embedded dimensions<\/span><\/a>” Oct. 4, 2007 it was shown that one can derive all forms of energy including that of a quantum system in terms of displacement in a *surface* of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

However assuming its energy is result of a displacement in four *spatial* dimension allows one to derive, the probability distribution associated with its wave function of individual particles by extrapolating the laws of a three-dimensional environments to a fourth *spatial* dimension.<\/span><\/p>\n

Classical mechanics tell us that because of the continuous properties of waves the article \u00e2\u20ac\u0153<\/span>Why is energy\/mass quantized?<\/span><\/a>\u00e2\u20ac\u009d associated with a quantum particle its energy would be distributed throughout the entire “surface” a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

This would be analogous to what happens when one vibrates a rod on a continuous rubber diaphragm.\u00c2\u00a0 The oscillations caused by the vibrations would be felt over its entire surface while their magnitudes would be greatest at the point of contact and decreases as one moves away from it.<\/span><\/p>\n

However, this means if one extrapolates the mechanics of the rubber diaphragm to a “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold one must assume the oscillations the associated with each individual quantum system must simultaneously exists everywhere in three-dimensional space.\u00c2\u00a0 This also means there would be a non-zero probability they could be found anywhere in our three-dimensional environment. <\/span><\/p>\n

As mentioned earlier the article \u00e2\u20ac\u0153<\/span>Why is energy\/mass quantized?<\/span><\/a>\u00e2\u20ac\u009d showed a quantum mechanical system is a result of a resonant structure formed on the “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Yet Classical Wave Mechanics tells us that resonance would most probably occur on the surface of the rubber sheet were the magnitude of the vibrations is greatest and would diminish as one move away from that point, <\/span><\/p>\n

Similarly a quantum system would most probably be found were the magnitude of the vibrations in a “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold is greatest and would diminish as one move away from that point, <\/span><\/p>\n

However this means each individual particle in a quantum system has its own wave and probably function and therefore the total probability of a quantum system being in a given configuration when observed would be equal to the sum of the individual probability functions of each particle in that system. <\/span><\/p>\n

As mentioned earlier Allen Aspect verified that Bell inequities were violated by the quantum mechanical measurements made on pairs of polarized photons that were space like separated or in different local realities.<\/span><\/p>\n

Yet, as just mentioned the wave or probability function of a quantum system is a summation of the probably function of all of the particles it contains.\u00c2\u00a0 Therefore, two particles which originated in the same quantum system and were moving in opposite directions would have identical wave or probability functions even if they were not physical connected.<\/span><\/p>\n

The measurements Allen Aspect made on the polarized photon that verified that Bells inequity was violated involved finding a correlation between the probabilities of each particle being in a given configuration based on the concepts of quantum mechanics.\u00c2\u00a0 When this correlation was found many assumed that somehow they must be entangled or physical connected even though they were in different local realities.\u00c2\u00a0 In other words the Newtonian concept separability does not apply to quantum environment.\u00c2\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\n

However, this may not be true. <\/span><\/p>\n

According to quantum mechanics act of measuring the state of a pair of entangled photons instantly affects the other no matter how far they are apart.\u00c2\u00a0 Yet if it is true as mentioned earlier that each particle has an identical wave or probably function as it moves through space the measurement of the state of one particle would be reflected in the measurement of the other because those measured states would have the same probability of occurring in each particle. <\/span><\/p>\n

In other words the reason why Bell’s inequity is violated in quantum system is not because they are physically entangled or connected at the time of measurement but because their individual wave or probability functions were “entangled<\/i>” or identical at the time of their separations and remained that way until a measurement was made.<\/span><\/p>\n

But to say the correlation of the quantum characteristics of two particles are identical because they are entangle or are physically connected is like saying the correlation between the color characteristics of the hair of identical twins is because they have been physically connect throughout their entire life. <\/span><\/p>\n

This shows that Quantum Mechanics can be consider “complete theory of nature”, contrary to what Einstein believed because one can define a mechanism responsible for the correlation of the quantum characteristics of particles that exist in non-local environments by extrapolating the “reality” of our three dimensional world to a fourth *spatial* dimension.<\/span><\/p>\n

Later Jeff<\/span><\/p>\n

Copyright Jeffrey O’Callaghan 2011<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

We have shown through the\u00c2\u00a0this blog and its companion book “The Reality of the Fourth spatial dimension” there are would be many theoretical advantages to defining the universe in terms of four *spatial* dimensions instead of four dimensional space-time. One is that it would allow to understand why it is not necessary to assume there … Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[21,57,22],"tags":[20,673,676,677,364,672,319,675,680,679,669,671,581,350,674,598,118,670,678,575,545,583,495],"yst_prominent_words":[1424,3111,1545,1546,2513,1408,1482,1549,1474,2512,1502,1656,1409,1665,1418,1471,1426,1420,1443,1415],"class_list":["post-7697","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-theroetical","category-particle-physics","category-the-unexplained","tag-quantum-mechanics","tag-allen-aspect","tag-atomic-orbital","tag-atomic-orbitals","tag-classical-resonance","tag-eigenstates","tag-einstein","tag-electron","tag-entangled","tag-entangled-photon","tag-epr-paradox","tag-hidden-variable","tag-john-bell","tag-louis-de-broglie","tag-natural-frequency","tag-newtonian-physics","tag-particle","tag-podolsky-rosen","tag-polarized-photon","tag-polarized-photons","tag-quantum-system","tag-separability","tag-wave-mechanics"],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7697","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7697"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7697\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25878,"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7697\/revisions\/25878"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7697"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7697"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7697"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=7697"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}