{"id":13547,"date":"2015-08-01T05:52:42","date_gmt":"2015-08-01T09:52:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/?p=13547"},"modified":"2018-12-15T07:33:35","modified_gmt":"2018-12-15T11:33:35","slug":"the-physical-significance-of-schrdinger-wave-equation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/the-physical-significance-of-schrdinger-wave-equation\/","title":{"rendered":"The physical meaning of Schrödinger wave equation"},"content":{"rendered":"

Quantum mechanics <\/span>defines our observable environment only in terms of the probabilistic values associated with Schr\u00c3\u00b6dinger\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s wave equation.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

However it is extremely difficult to define a set of statements which explains how those probabilities are physically connected to it even though it has held up to rigorous and thorough experimental testing.<\/span><\/p>\n

This may be the reason most physicists consider quantum mechanics only in terms of its mathematical formalization instead trying to understand the meaning of it in terms of the space-time environment we occupy.  <\/span>
\nF<\/span>or example in 1924 Louis de Broglie was the first to realize all particles are physically composed of a matter wave as the discovery of electron diffraction by crystals in 1927 by Davisson and Germer) verified.  However in his paper, \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Theory of the double solution<\/span>\u00e2\u20ac\u0153<\/em> he unsuccessfully attempted to define a physical interpretation of <\/span>Schr\u00c3\u00b6dinger equation in classical terms of space and time. <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

As is pointed at his biography on the nobleprize.org<\/span><\/a> web site in “1951, he together with some of his younger colleagues made another attempt, one which he abandoned in the face of the almost universal adherence of physicists to the purely probabilistic mathematical interpretation of, Bohr, and Heisenberg.”<\/span><\/p>\n

However the fact that no has been able to physically connect those probabilities to our environment does not change the fact that there must be one because if there wasn’t they could not interact with it to create the physicality of observable world upon which those probabilities are based.<\/span><\/p>\n

As mentioned earlier <\/span>Louis de Broglie and his <\/span>colleagues tried unsuccessfully to find a <\/span>physical interpretation of <\/span>Schr\u00c3\u00b6dinger equation in classical terms of space and time.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

However the reason for their failure may be due to the fact that it is related to the spatial not time dependent properties of the wave function.<\/span><\/p>\n

If so one may be able to establish the connection by looking at it in terms of its spatial properties instead of the space-time one <\/span>Louis de Broglie and his <\/span>colleagues used.<\/span><\/p>\n

Einstein gave us the ability to do this defined the geometric properties of space-time in terms of the constant velocity of light and a dynamic balance between mass and energy because that  provided a method of converting a unit of time in a space-time environment of unit of space in four *spatial* dimensions.  Additionally because the velocity of light is constant he also defined a one to one quantitative and qualitative correspondence between his space-time universe and one made up of four *spatial* dimensions.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

The fact that one can use Einstein\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s equations to qualitatively and quantitatively redefine the curvature in space-time he associated with energy in terms of four *spatial* dimensions is one bases for assuming as was done in the article \u00e2\u20ac\u0153<\/span>Defining energy?<\/span><\/a>\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Nov 27, 2007 that all forms of energy can be derived in terms of a spatial displacement in a “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension.<\/span><\/p>\n

This<\/span> would have allowed Louis de Broglie to <\/span>physically connect the probabilities associated<\/span> Schr\u00c3\u00b6dinger equation<\/span> to the quantum properties of a matter wave in terms of a physical or spatial displacement in a “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension<\/i> as was done in the article  “<\/span><\/span>Why is energy\/mass quantized?<\/span><\/a>” Oct. 4, 2007.<\/span> <\/p>\n

<\/span>Briefly that article showed that one can do this <\/span>by assuming they are caused by the formation of <\/span>a resonant system on a “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to fourth “spatial” dimension.  This is because <\/span>it showed the four conditions required for resonance to occur in a three-dimensional environment, an object, or substance with a natural frequency, a forcing function at the same frequency as the natural frequency, the lack of a damping frequency and the ability for the substance to oscillate spatial would occur in one made up of four.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span>The existence of four *spatial* dimensions would give a matter wave the ability to oscillate spatially on a “surface” between a third and fourth *spatial* dimension thereby fulfilling one of the requirements for classical resonance to occur.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span>These oscillations would be caused by an event such as the decay of a subatomic particle or the shifting of an electron in an atomic orbital.  This would force the “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension to oscillate with the frequency associated with the energy of that event.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span>However, the oscillations caused by such an event would serve as forcing function allowing a resonant system or “structure” to be established on a surface of a three-dimensional space manifold.<\/span><\/p>\n

Yet the classical laws of three-dimensional space tell us the energy of resonant systems can only take on the discontinuous or discreet energies associated with their fundamental or harmonic of their fundamental frequency. <\/span><\/p>\n

Additionally it also tells us why in terms of the physical properties four dimensional space-time or four *spatial* dimensions an electron cannot fall into the nucleus is because, as was shown in that article all energy is contained in four dimensional resonant systems. In other words the energy released by an electron “falling” into it would have to manifest itself in terms of a resonate system. Since the fundamental or lowest frequency available for a stable resonate system in either four dimensional space-time or four spatial dimension corresponds to the energy of an electron it becomes one of the fundamental energy units of the universe.<\/font><\/p>\n

<\/span>However, these are the similar to the quantum mechanical properties of energy\/mass in that they can only take on the discontinuous or discreet energies associated with the formula E=hv where “E” equals the energy of a particle “h” equal Planck’s constant “v” equals the frequency of its wave component.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span>In other words Louis de Broglie would have been able to physicality connect the the quantum mechanical properties of his particle waves to <\/span>Schr\u00c3\u00b6dinger equation <\/span>in terms of the discrete incremental energies associated with a resonant system in four *spatial* dimensions if he had assume space was composed of it instead of four dimensional space-time.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/span>Yet it also would have allowed him to define the physical boundaries of a quantum system in terms of the geometric properties of four *spatial* dimensions. <\/span><\/p>\n

For example in classical physics, a point on the two-dimensional surface of a piece of paper is confined to that surface.  However, that surface can oscillate up or down with respect to three-dimensional space.  <\/span><\/p>\n

Similarly an object occupying a volume of three-dimensional space would be confined to it however, it could, similar to the surface of the paper oscillate \u00e2\u20ac\u0153up\u00e2\u20ac\u009d or \u00e2\u20ac\u0153down\u00e2\u20ac\u009d with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension. <\/span><\/p>\n

The confinement of the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153upward\u00e2\u20ac\u009d and \u00e2\u20ac\u0153downward\u00e2\u20ac\u009d oscillations of a three-dimension volume with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension is what defines the spatial boundaries associated with a particle in the article <\/span>“<\/span>Why is energy\/mass quantized?<\/span><\/a>” Oct. 4, 2007<\/span><\/p>\n

As mentioned earlier in the article \u00e2\u20ac\u0153<\/font><\/font>Defining energy?<\/span><\/a>\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Nov 27, 2007 showed all forms of energy can be derived in terms of a spatial displacement in a “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span>However assuming <\/span><\/i>the energy associated with Louis de <\/span>Broglie particle wave is result of a displacement in four *spatial* dimension instead of four dimensional space-time as was done earlier would allows one to connect the probabilities associated with <\/span><\/i>Schr\u00c3\u00b6dinger equation to the physicality of our observable environment we all live in. <\/span><\/i><\/font><\/font><\/p>\n

Classical mechanics tell us that due to the continuous properties of waves the energy the article “<\/span>Why is energy\/mass quantized?<\/span><\/a>” Oct. 4, 2007<\/span> associated with a quantum system would be distributed throughout the entire “surface” a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension. <\/span><\/p>\n

For example Classical mechanics tells us that the energy of a vibrating or oscillating ball on a rubber diaphragm would be disturbed over its entire surface while the magnitude of those vibrations would decease as one move away from the focal point of the oscillations.  <\/span><\/p>\n

Similarly if the assumption that quantum properties of energy\/mass are a result of vibrations or oscillations in a “surface” of three-dimensional space is correct then classical mechanics tell us that those oscillations would be distributed over the entire “surface” three-dimensional space while the magnitude of those vibrations would be greatest at the focal point of the oscillations and decreases as one moves away from it.<\/span><\/p>\n

As mentioned earlier the article \u00e2\u20ac\u0153<\/span>Why is energy\/mass quantized?<\/span><\/a>\u00e2\u20ac\u009d shown a quantum particle is a result of a resonant structure formed on the “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension. <\/span><\/p>\n

Yet Classical Wave Mechanics tells us resonance would most probably occur on the surface of the rubber sheet were the magnitude of the vibrations is greatest and would diminish as one move away from that point, <\/span><\/p>\n

Similarly a particle would most probably be found were the magnitude of the vibrations in a “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold is greatest and would diminish as one move away from that point. <\/span><\/p>\n

This shows how one can physically connect the probabilities associated <\/span>Schr\u00c3\u00b6dinger wave equation to our observable environment by redefining it in terms of four *spatial* dimensions.<\/font><\/p>\n

It should be remember Einstein\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s genius allows us to choose to define a quantum system in either a space-time environment or one consisting of four *spatial* dimension when he defined the geometry of space-time in terms of the constant velocity of light. This interchangeability broadens the environment encompassed by his theories thereby giving us a new perspective on the probabilistic properties of a quantum environment and how they physically connected to our observable universe<\/font>.<\/p>\n

<\/span>Later Jeff<\/span><\/p>\n

Copyright Jeffrey O’Callaghan 2015<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Quantum mechanics defines our observable environment only in terms of the probabilistic values associated with Schr\u00c3\u00b6dinger\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s wave equation. However it is extremely difficult to define a set of statements which explains how those probabilities are physically connected to it even though it has held up to rigorous and thorough experimental testing. This may be the … Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[157,21,19],"tags":[20,163,363,494,1186,1088,301,909,350,1184,1044,1183,48,1182,42,1185],"yst_prominent_words":[1565,1424,1421,3106,3105,3108,1408,3107,1569,1482,3102,3104,1409,3103,1665,1418,1696,1420,1443,1415],"class_list":["post-13547","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-1-predictions","category-theroetical","category-relativity","tag-quantum-mechanics","tag-classical-mechanics","tag-classical-physics","tag-electron-diffraction","tag-focal-point","tag-four-dimensions","tag-four-spatial-dimensions","tag-geometric-properties-of-a-space-time","tag-louis-de-broglie","tag-nobleprize","tag-observable-world","tag-schrodinger-equation","tag-space","tag-space-and-time","tag-time","tag-why-is-mass-quantized"],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13547","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13547"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13547\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13547"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13547"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13547"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=13547"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}