{"id":12445,"date":"2014-08-15T06:01:42","date_gmt":"2014-08-15T10:01:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/?p=12445"},"modified":"2018-12-15T08:16:10","modified_gmt":"2018-12-15T12:16:10","slug":"fire-or-ice-how-will-our-universe-end","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/fire-or-ice-how-will-our-universe-end\/","title":{"rendered":"Fire or ice how will our universe end?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Before the discovery of Dark Energy cosmologists had two models of how the universe’s expansion would end. <\/font><\/p>\n

In first scenario, there would be enough matter in the universe to slow the expansion to the point it would come to a halt and gravitational forces would  cause it to begin contracting which eventually would result in a fiery death called the “Big Crunch.<\/font><\/p>\n

In the other scenario, there would be too little matter to stop the expansion and everything would drift on forever, always slowing but never stopping. This would end in a vast, dark, and cold state: a “Big Chill,” as the stars faded and died out. <\/font><\/font><\/p>\n

However the discovery of a force causing the expansion of the universe to accelerate called Dark Energy opened up the possibility that the galaxies, solar system, stars, planets, and even molecules and atoms could be shredded by the ever-faster expansion.  In other words the universe that was born in a violent expansion could end with an even more violent expansion called the Big Rip. <\/font><\/p>\n

Most scientists would agree that the best way of determining which one these scenarios defines its ultimate fate would be to understand the forces involved based on the most successful theories we have regarding the macroscopic properties of the universe. <\/font><\/i>
\nHowever modern theories only address two of them.  For example the laws of thermodynamics which defines the forces associated with heat early in the universe and Einstein General Theory of Relativity which defines the gravitational forces which effect its evolution are two of the most success theories we have.  Unfortunately neither of them, in their present form addresses the expansive force called Dark Energy. <\/font><\/p>\n

This is true even though Einstein foresaw the existence of Dark Energy when he added a cosmological constant to his General Theory of Relativity to make it conform to his belief in a static universe.  <\/font><\/p>\n

Granted he added it in an “adhoc” manner to force it, in keeping with physicists thinking at the time to predict a stationary universe.  However when it became clear that the universe wasn’t static, but was expanding Einstein abandoned the constant, calling it the ‘”biggest blunder” of his life.<\/font><\/p>\n

But lately scientists have revived Einstein’s cosmological constant (denoted by the Greek capital letter lambda) to explain this mysterious force which as mentioned earlier is causing the expansion of our universe to accelerate even though they have been unable to Einstein integrate it into the theoretical structure of his General Theory of Relativity. <\/font><\/p>\n

However we may find clue as to why by observing how our universe is expanding.<\/font><\/p>\n

For example o<\/span>bservations of the universe’s expansion tell us that three-dimensional space is expanding towards a higher spatial dimension not a time or space-time dimension.   <\/span><\/font><\/p>\n

Therefore, to explain the how the expansive force called dark energy is accelerating the spatial expansion of the universe one would have to assume the existence of a another *spatial* or fourth *spatial* dimension in addition to the three spatial dimensions and one time dimension that Einstein\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s theories contain to account for that observation. <\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

This would be true if Einstein had not given us a means of qualitatively and quantitatively converting the geometric properties of his space-time universe to one consisting of only four *spatial* dimensions. <\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

He did this when he defined the geometric properties of a space-time universe in terms of a dynamic balance between mass and energy defined by the equation E=mc^2 and the constant velocity of light because that provided a method of converting the displacement in space-time manifold he associated with energy to its <\/span>equivalent displacement in four *spatial* dimensions.  Additionally because the velocity of light is constant he also defined a one to one qualitative and quantitative correspondence between his space-time universe and one made up of four *spatial* dimensions. <\/font><\/font><\/p>\n

In other words by defining the geometric properties of a space-time universe in terms of mass\/energy and the constant velocity of light he provided a qualitative and quantitative means of redefining it in terms of the geometry of four *spatial* dimensions. <\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

The fact that the equation E=mc^2 allows us to quantitatively derive the spatial properties of energy in a space-time universe in terms of four *spatial* dimensions is the bases for assuming as was done in the article \u00e2\u20ac\u0153<\/font><\/span>Defining energy<\/font><\/span><\/a>\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Nov 27, 2007 that all forms of energy can be derived in terms of a displacement in a “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension instead of one in a space time manifold.<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

As mentioned earlier one reason why it is difficult <\/span>to integrate the accelerated special expansion of three-dimensional space towards a higher space dimension into Einstein space-time universe because it does not define one.  <\/span><\/font><\/p>\n

However it is easy to do if one redefined it, as was done above in terms of four *spatial* dimension because that higher spatial dimension would become an integral part of its theoretical structure. <\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

Yet it also allows one to understand how and why Dark Energy is causing the accelerated spatial expansion of the universe and what its ultimate fate will be in terms the laws of thermodynamics and the concepts of Einstein’s theories.<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

We know from the study of thermodynamics that energy flows from areas of high density to one of low density very similar to how water flows form an elevated or “high density” point to a lower one. <\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

For example, if the walls of an above ground pool filled with water collapse the molecules on the elevated two-dimensional surface of the water will flow or expand and accelerate outward towards the three-dimensional environment surrounding it while the force associated with that expansion decreases as it expands. <\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

Additionally we know from observations of the cosmic background radiation that presently our three-dimensional universe has an average energy component equal to about 3.7 degrees Kelvin.  <\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

However this means that according to concepts developed in the article \u00e2\u20ac\u0153<\/font><\/span>Defining energy<\/font><\/span><\/a>” (mentioned earlier) the three-dimensional “surface” of our universe which has an average energy component of 3.7 degree Kelvin would be elevated with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension.<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

Yet this means similar to the two dimensional surface of the water in the pool the particles that occupy that elevated region of three-dimensional space and the space they occupy will accelerate and flow or expand outward in the four dimensional environment surrounding it and that the force associated with that expansion will decline as it expands.<\/font><\/span><\/p>\n

This shows how reformulating Einstein’s theories in terms of four *spatial* dimensions allows one to use the laws of thermodynamics to explain what the force called Dark Energy is and why it is causing the accelerated expansion of the universe in terms of those theories. <\/font><\/p>\n

Many feel that because space is everywhere, the force called Dark Energy is everywhere, and its effects increase as space expands. In contrast, gravity’s force is stronger when things are close together and weaker when they are far apart.<\/font><\/p>\n

However the law of conservation of energy\/mass tells that energy\/mass cannot be created or destroyed in a closed environment. Therefore because the universe is  us since, by definition is closed system the kinetic energy of the universe\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s energy\/mass cannot exceed its gravitational contractive properties of its mass because Einstein tells us that its kinetic energy is made up of that mass. <\/font><\/p>\n

Therefore because some of the kinetic energy of some of its components is not directed towards its expansion because of the random motion of star and galaxies the total gravitational contractive properties of its energy\/mass must exceed the kinetic energy of its expansive components. Which means at some point in time the gravitation contractive potential of its energy\/mass must exceed the kinetic energy of its expansion because as just mentioned not all of its kinetic energy is directed towards its expansion. Therefore at that point, in time the universe will have to enter a contractive phase.<\/font><\/p>\n

Some may disagree by saying that as the universe expands its energy is spread out over a larger volume so after a while it just vanishes so to speak or as some like to say that the universe experiences a heat death. However Einstein theories do not permit energy to just disappear or “die”. It unequivocally tells us that if the kinetic energy content in a closed environment decreases as it cools the mass content of that environment must increase irrespective of the volume of that environment. Therefore because by definition the universe is a closed system one must assume that any reduction in its overall energy content of the universe including its heat energy must be must be compensated for by an increase in its total attractive gravitational mass content.<\/p>\n

Some others would disagree because recent observations suggest that a force called Dark energy is causing the expansion of the universe accelerate. Therefore they believe that its expansion will continue forever. However, as was shown in the article “Dark Energy and the evolution of the universe” if one assumes the law of conservation of mass\/energy is valid, as we have done here than the gravitational contractive properties of its mass equivalent will eventually exceed its expansive energy associated with dark energy and therefore the universe must at some time in the future enter a contractive phase.<\/p>\n

We know from observations that heat is generated when we compress a gas and that the heat creates pressure that opposes further contractions.<\/p>\n

Similarly the contraction of the universe will create heat which will oppose its further contractions.<\/p>\n

Therefore the velocity of contraction will increase until the momentum of the galaxies, planets, components of the universe equals the radiation pressure generated by the heat of its contraction.<\/p>\n

At this point in time the total kinetic energy of the collapsing universe would be equal and oppositely directed with respect to the radiation pressure associated with the heat of its collapse. From this point on the velocity of the contraction will slow due to the radiation pressure and be maintained by the momentum associated with the remaining mass component of the universe.<\/p>\n

However, after a certain point in time the heat and radiation pressure generated by its contraction will become great enough to ionize the remaining mass and cause it to reexpand because the expansive forces associated with the radiation pressure will exceed the contractive forces associated with its mass.<\/p>\n

This will result in the universe entering an expansive phase and going through another age of recombination when the comic background radiation was emitted. The reason it will experience an age of recombination as it passes through each cycle is because the heat of its collapse would be great enough to completely ionize all forms of matter.<\/p>\n

However, at some point in time the contraction phase will begin again because as mentioned earlier its kinetic energy cannot exceed the gravitational energy associated with the total mass\/energy in the universe.<\/p>\n

Since the universe is a closed system, the amplitude of the expansions and contractions will drift and stabilize at a specific value corresponding to its resonant frequency similar to how a guitar string drift and stabilize at its resonant frequency<\/p>\n

This results in the universe experiencing in a never-ending cycle of expansions and contractions whose frequency would be defined by its resonant properties.<\/p>\n

Many cosmologists do not accept this cyclical scenario of expansion and contractions because they believe a collapsing universe would end in the formation of a singularity similar to the ones found in a black hole and therefore, it could not re-expand.<\/p>\n

However, according to the first law of thermodynamic the universe would have to begin expanding before it reached a singularity because that law states that energy in an isolated system can neither be created nor destroyed<\/p>\n

Therefore because the universe is by definition an isolated system; the energy generated by its gravitational collapse cannot be radiated to another volume but must remain within it. This means the radiation pressure exerted by its collapse must eventually exceed momentum of its contraction and the universe would have to enter an expansion phase because its momentum will carry it beyond the equilibrium point were the radiation pressure is greater that the momentum of its mass.<\/p>\n

This would be analogous to the how momentum of a mass on a spring causes it to stretch beyond its equilibrium point resulting it osculating around it.<\/p>\n

There can be no other interpretation if one assumes the validity of the first law of thermodynamics which states that the total energy is a closed system is defined its mass and the momentum of its components. Therefore, when one decreases the other must increase and therefore it must oscillate around a point in space and time.<\/p>\n

The reason a singularity can form in black hole is because it is not an isolate system therefore the thermal radiation associated with its collapse can be radiated into the surrounding space. Therefore, its collapse can continue because momentum of its mass can exceed the radiation pressure cause by its collapse in the volume surrounding a black hole.<\/p>\n

<\/font><\/font> In other words if this theoretical model is correct our universe has never ending future which exists between an icy death caused by Dark Energy and a fiery rebirth created by gravity. <\/font><\/p>\n

Later Jeff <\/font><\/font><\/p>\n


\n<\/font><\/font> <\/font>Copyright Jeffrey O\u00e2\u20ac\u2122Callaghan 2014<\/font><\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Before the discovery of Dark Energy cosmologists had two models of how the universe’s expansion would end. In first scenario, there would be enough matter in the universe to slow the expansion to the point it would come to a halt and gravitational forces would  cause it to begin contracting which eventually would result in … Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[21,19,27],"tags":[271,979,835,331,983,110,306,328,270,996,836,995,994,300,307],"yst_prominent_words":[1565,1451,2925,1692,1431,2707,2819,2855,1550,1693,2679,1731,1767,1694,1764,1605,1661,2971,1606,1697],"class_list":["post-12445","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-theroetical","category-relativity","category-cosmology","tag-3-7-degrees-kelvin","tag-big-chill","tag-big-rip","tag-cosmic-background-radiation","tag-cosmological-constant","tag-dark-energy","tag-define-energy","tag-defining-energy","tag-emc2","tag-einsteins-general-theory-of-relativity","tag-higher-spatial-dimension","tag-laws-of-thermodynamics","tag-macroscopic-properties-of-the-universe","tag-space-time-universe","tag-study-of-thermodynamics"],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12445","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12445"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12445\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12445"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12445"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12445"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=12445"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}