{"id":11695,"date":"2014-01-01T05:00:46","date_gmt":"2014-01-01T09:00:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/?p=11695"},"modified":"2022-07-28T20:32:09","modified_gmt":"2022-07-29T00:32:09","slug":"articles-posted-in-2014","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/articles-posted-in-2014\/","title":{"rendered":"Articles posted in 2014"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Articles posted <\/span> in 2022<\/a>, <\/span> 2021<\/a>, 2020<\/a>, <\/span> 2019<\/a><\/span>, <\/span> 2017 and 18<\/a>, 2016<\/a>, 2015<\/a>, 2013<\/a>, 2012<\/a>, 2011<\/a>, 2010<\/a>, 2009<\/a>, 2008<\/a>, and 2007<\/a><\/p>\n

Preface<\/strong><\/p>\n

The purpose of this blog is to elaborate on the theoretical ideas contained in its companion book “The Reality of Four Spatial Dimensions<\/p>\n

In Thomas S. Kuhn’s book “The Structure of Scientific Revolution” he documents the doubts that precipitate a paradigm change in scientific thought.<\/p>\n

For example, even though one could still make accurate predictions of planetary motions using the 15 century geocentric models it became increasing more difficult to integrate that concept with the more accurate observational data provided by the new technologies of that day. This resulted in some scientists questioning their validity.<\/p>\n

He suggests the doubt generated by its persistent inability of to explain new data lead many scientists of that period to adopt the simpler rules of the revolutionary heliocentric model.<\/p>\n

Modern physics appears to be on the verge of a similar revolution because the discoveries of dark matter and dark energy are extremely difficult to integrate into its current theoretical models.<\/p>\n

As Thomas S. Kuhn points out failure of an existing paradigm is a prelude to the search for a new one.<\/p>\n

It continues the search, began in its companion book the “The Reality of Four Spatial Dimensions” to not only explain how one can seamlessly integrate the observations of dark matter and dark energy into a theoretical model based on the existence of four *spatial* dimensions but to provide a unifying mechanism responsible for the four forces of nature (gravity, electromagnetism, the weak, and strong) governing the interactions of matter, energy, space, and time.<\/p>\n

Each article covers one aspect of a search for the “reality” it defines. For example, the article “What is dark energy” defines its casually in terms of an interaction of three-dimensional space with a fourth while others derive the quantum mechanical properties of energy\/mass in terms of a resonant system formed by a matter wave on a “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension.<\/p>\n

It is not meant to verify the many answers found in the book “The Reality of Four Spatial Dimensions”. Instead it is meant to give the scientific community the specific information and experiment techniques required to either verify or falsify it contents. It relies less on mathematics and more on conceptual logic and thought experiments (much like Albert Einstein did) to show how one can explain and predict all modern observations by extrapolating the rules defining classical three-dimensional space to a fourth *spatial* dimension.<\/p>\n

Copyright Jeffrey O’Callaghan 2014<\/p>\n

“The universe’s most powerful enabling tool is not
\nknowledge or understanding but imagination
\nbecause it extends the reality of
\none’s environment.”<\/div>\n
\u00a0<\/span><\/div>\n
\u00a0<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Topic<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

The mathematics of the real world<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Why the cosmological constant is what it is<\/span><\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Is Quantum Mechanics a Fundamental or emergent property of space-time?<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

In the beginning<\/span><\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

A classical explanation of Black Body Radiation<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

The causality of quantum probabilities or why God must play dice<\/span>.<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Can we influence reality?<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

The structure of our reality<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Fire or ice how will our universe end?<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Integrating the Standard Model into Einstein’s gravitational theory <\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Integrating gravity into the Standard Model<\/span><\/a> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

The reliability of our mathematical universes<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

How Einstein could have explained Dark Energy<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Did Einstein predict the Higgs mechanism in 1920?<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Should measurement define “reality”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

A cosmological history lesson<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

The reality behind quantum entanglement<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

The Geometry of a particle wave<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Solving the conceptual problems with quantum fields <\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

A Classical interpretation of quantum mechanics<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Mass from first principals<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Should we let our imaginations define \u00e2\u20ac\u0153reality\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Deriving the fundamental constants of nature<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

The geometry of antimatter<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

Articles posted <\/span> in 2022<\/a>, <\/span> 2021<\/a>, 2020<\/a>, <\/span> 2019<\/a><\/span>, <\/span> 2017 and 18<\/a>, 2016<\/a>, 2015<\/a>, 2013<\/a>, 2012<\/a>, 2011<\/a>, 2010<\/a>, 2009<\/a>, 2008<\/a>, and 2007<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n