{"id":11209,"date":"2013-04-15T07:36:04","date_gmt":"2013-04-15T11:36:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/?p=11209"},"modified":"2018-12-15T08:49:02","modified_gmt":"2018-12-15T12:49:02","slug":"the-reality-of-quantum-fields","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/the-reality-of-quantum-fields\/","title":{"rendered":"The reality of Quantum Fields"},"content":{"rendered":"

Is it possible to define the physical “reality” of a Quantum field?<\/span><\/p>\n

We think so.<\/span><\/p>\n

Many including Albert Einstein and Erin Schr\u00c3\u00b6dinger, had difficulty accepting the “reality” of quantum mechanics because many of its concepts appear to contradict those of our observable universe.<\/span><\/p>\n

For example in a quantum system Schr\u00c3\u00b6dinger’s wave equation defines the field properties of its environment and predicts the future distribution of a particle’s position only in terms of the abstract properties of probabilities. <\/span><\/p>\n

However many including Einstein and Schr\u00c3\u00b6dinger define reality in terms of what they see or touch.<\/span><\/p>\n

For example, Einstein used the observable “reality” of the interactions of electromagnetic energy with a photoelectric material to derive the quantum mechanical properties of energy\/mass while using the observable properties of light in our three-dimensional environment to define his space-time universe.<\/span><\/p>\n

In other words his conclusion that electromagnetic energy is quantized was based on the physical “reality” of the environment sounding the photoelectric material and how electromagnetic energy interacted with it, not on the abstract probabilities associated with quantum fields.<\/span><\/p>\n

However the abstract properties of probabilities do share a common characteristic with Einstein’s space-time universe in that time or a space-time dimension have never be seen or touched and therefore they like the probability functions of quantum field theory are, by definition abstract quantities. <\/span><\/p>\n

Fortunately they also have a common element, as mentioned earlier in the physically observable non-abstract properties of the *spatial* dimensions because the probabilities associated with Schr\u00c3\u00b6dinger’s wave equation are expressed in terms of the spatial properties of position.<\/span><\/p>\n

Therefore because they share a common connection to the observable “reality” of our three-dimensional spatial environment one should be able to define the physical “reality” of both Einstein space-time dimension and the field properties of quantum mechanics in terms of their non-abstract spatial components. <\/span>
\nEinstein gave us the ability to do this when he used the constant velocity of light in the equation E=mc^2 to define geometric properties of energy\/mass because it allows one to convert a unit of time in his four dimensional space-time universe to a unit of space in a one consisting of only four *spatial* dimensions.  Additionally because the velocity of light is constant it is possible to defined a one to one correspondence between his space-time universe and one made up of four *spatial* dimensions.<\/font><\/p>\n

The fact that one can use the Einstein\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s equations to qualitatively<\/i> and qualitatively<\/i> derive the spatial properties of energy in a space-time universe in terms of four *spatial* dimensions is one bases for assuming, as was done in the article \u00e2\u20ac\u0153<\/span>Defining energy?<\/span><\/a>\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Nov 27, 2007 that all forms of energy can be derived in terms of a spatial displacement in a “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension.  <\/span><\/p>\n

One of the theoretical advantages of modeling the existence of energy\/mass on four *spatial* dimensions instead of four dimension space-time is <\/span>it allows one to derive the “reality” of a quantum fields in terms of the observable non-abstract properties of our three-dimensional environment.<\/span><\/p>\n

The physical “reality” of the field properties energy\/mass in four *spatial* dimension was developed in the article \u00e2\u20ac\u0153<\/span><\/span>Electromagnetism in four *spatial* dimensions<\/span><\/a>\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Sept 27, 2007 where it was shown the forces associated with an electromagnetic field can be explained and predicted in terms of matter wave on field consisting of four *spatial* dimensions.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Briefly it showed that one can derive its field properties by extrapolating the observable non-abstract properties of a three-dimensional environment to a fourth *spatial* dimension.<\/span><\/p>\n

For example a wave on the two-dimensional surface of water causes a point on that surface to be become displaced or rise above or below the equilibrium point that existed before the wave was present.  A force will be developed by the differential displacement of the surfaces, which will result in the elevated and depressed portions of the water moving towards or become “attracted” to each other and the surface of the water.<\/span><\/p>\n

Similarly a matter wave on the “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension would cause a point on that “surface” to become displaced or rise above and below the equilibrium point that existed before the wave was present.<\/span><\/p>\n

Therefore observations  of our three dimensional “reality”, if extrapolated  to four *spatial* dimensions tells us the force developed by the differential displacements caused by a matter wave moving on a “surface” of three-dimensional space with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension will result in its elevated and depressed portions moving towards or become “attracted” to each other. <\/span><\/p>\n

This defines the causality of the attractive forces of unlike charges associated with the electromagnetic wave component of a photon in terms of a force developed by a differential displacement of a point on a “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension. <\/span><\/p>\n

However, it also provides a non-abstract mechanism for understanding why similar charges repel each other because observations of wave on the surface of water tell us that there is a direct relationship between the magnitudes of a displacement in its surface to the magnitude of the force resisting that displacement. <\/span><\/p>\n

Similarly the magnitude of a displacement in a “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension caused by two similar charges will be greater than that caused by a single one.  Therefore, similar charges will repel each other because the magnitude of the force resisting the displacement will be greater for two charges than it would be for a single charge. <\/span><\/p>\n

One can define the causality of electrical component of electromagnetic radiation in terms of the energy associated with its “peaks” and “troughs” that is directed perpendicular to its velocity vector while its magnetic component would be associated with the horizontal force developed by that perpendicular displacement. <\/span><\/p>\n

However, observations of our three dimensional environment tell us a horizontal force will be developed by that perpendicular or vertical displacement which will always be 90 degrees out of phase with it.  This force is called magnetism.<\/span><\/p>\n

This is analogous to how the vertical force pushing up of on mountain also generates a horizontal force, which pulls matter horizontally towards the apex of that displacement.<\/span><\/p>\n

This shows how one can explain and predict the continuous field properties of electromagnetism by extrapolating the observable non-abstract properties of our three dimensional environment to a matter wave moving on a “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension.<\/span><\/p>\n

However, as was shown in the article \u00e2\u20ac\u0153<\/span><\/span>The Photon: a matter wave?<\/span><\/a>\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Oct. 1, 2007 the quantum field properties of four *spatial* dimension can also be derived by extrapolating the observable non-abstract resonant properties of a three-dimensional environment to one consisting of four *spatial* dimension.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

There are four conditions required for resonance to occur in a three-dimensional environment an object or substance with a natural frequency, a forcing function at the same frequency as the natural frequency, the lack of a damping frequency and the ability for the substance to oscillate spatial.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

The existence of four *spatial* dimensions would give the continuous surface or field of three-dimensional space manifold (the substance) the ability to oscillate spatially with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension thereby fulfilling one of the requirements for classical resonance to occur. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

These oscillations would be caused by an event such as the decay of a subatomic particle or the shifting of an electron in an atomic orbital.  This would force the “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension to oscillate with the frequency associated with the energy of that event.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Therefore, these oscillations in four *spatial* dimensions, would meet the requirements mentioned above for the formation of a resonant system or “structure” in space.  <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Observations of a three-dimensional environment show the energy associated with resonant system can only take on the incremental or discreet values associated with a fundamental or a harmonic of the fundamental frequency of its environment. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Similarly the energy associated with resonant systems in four *spatial* dimensions could only take on the incremental or discreet values associated a fundamental or a harmonic of the fundamental frequency of its environment. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

These resonant systems in four *spatial* dimensions are responsible for the incremental or discreet field energies associated <\/span>quantum and electromagnetic<\/span> field theories.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

However if true one must also show how the probabilities associated with <\/span>Schr\u00c3\u00b6dinger\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s equation<\/font> could have evolved out of those field properties. <\/span><\/font><\/p>\n

Classical mechanics tell us that because of the continuous properties of waves, the energy the article <\/font>\u00e2\u20ac\u0153<\/span><\/font>The Photon: a matter wave?<\/span><\/a>\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Oct. 1, 2007 <\/span><\/span>associated with all quantum systems such as a photon would be distributed throughout the entire “surface” a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension similar to how the wave generated by a vibrating ball on a surface of a rubber diaphragm are disturbed over its entire surface while the magnitude of the displacement it causes will decrease as one moves away from the focal point of the balls oscillations. <\/font><\/font><\/p>\n


\n<\/font><\/font> However, this means if one extrapolates the mechanics of the rubber diaphragm to a “surface” of three-dimensional space one must assume the oscillations associated with each individual quantum system must be disturbed thought the entire universe while the spatial displacement associated with its energy; defined in the in the article <\/font>\u00e2\u20ac\u0153<\/span>Defining energy?<\/span><\/a>\u00e2\u20ac\u009d Nov 27, 2007<\/span><\/font> would decrease as one moves away from its focal point.  Therefore their is a non-zero probability they could be found anywhere in our three-dimensional environment.  <\/font><\/font><\/p>\n

Classical Wave Mechanics also tells us a resonance would most probably occur on the surface of the rubber sheet were the magnitude of the vibrations is greatest and would diminish as one move away from that point, <\/font><\/p>\n

Similarly an observer would most probably find a quantum system were the magnitude of the vibrations in a “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold is greatest and would diminish as one move away from that point.<\/font><\/p>\n


\n<\/font><\/font> However this is exactly what is predicted by Quantum mechanics in that one can only define a particle’s position or momentum in terms of the probabilistic values associated with vibrations of its wave function.<\/font><\/p>\n

This shows how one can <\/span>define the “reality” of the continuous field associated with Schr\u00c3\u00b6dinger’s wave equation and its associated probabilities in terms of a physical mechanism based on the observable non-abstract “reality” of our three-dimensional environment.<\/span><\/font><\/i><\/p>\n

Latter Jeff <\/span><\/p>\n

Copyright 2013 Jeffrey O’Callaghan<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Is it possible to define the physical “reality” of a Quantum field? We think so. Many including Albert Einstein and Erin Schr\u00c3\u00b6dinger, had difficulty accepting the “reality” of quantum mechanics because many of its concepts appear to contradict those of our observable universe. For example in a quantum system Schr\u00c3\u00b6dinger’s wave equation defines the field … Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[21,57,22],"tags":[585,767,270,763,383,761,765,287,766,762,750,343,433,302,764],"yst_prominent_words":[1565,1424,1421,2811,2810,2445,1448,1408,1427,1482,2809,1534,1409,1665,1418,1631,2077,1420,1443,1415],"class_list":["post-11209","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-theroetical","category-particle-physics","category-the-unexplained","tag-albert-einstein","tag-continuous-field","tag-emc2","tag-einsteins-space-time","tag-electromagnetic-radiation","tag-erin-schrodinger","tag-like-charges","tag-matter-wave","tag-non-abstract-mechanism","tag-photoelectric-material","tag-quantum-field","tag-resonance","tag-schrodingers-wave-equation","tag-three-dimensional-space","tag-unlike-charges"],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11209","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11209"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11209\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11209"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11209"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11209"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.theimagineershome.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=11209"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}