We have shown throughout this blog and its companion book “The Reality of the Fourth *Spatial* Dimension” there would be many theoretical advantages to defining space in terms four *spatial* dimensions instead of four-dimensional space-time. One is that it would allow for understanding of the physical significance of Planck’s constant in terms of the laws of … Read more
We have shown throughout this blog and its companion book "The Reality of the Fourth Spatial Dimension" there are many theoretical advantages to defining the universe in terms of four *spatial* dimensions instead of four-dimensional space-time and Dark matter or a continuous non-quantized field of energy/mass. One is that it would allow one to quantifiably … Read more
We have shown throughout this blog there would be many theoretical advantages to defining space in terms of a continuous non-quantized field of energy/mass and four *spatial* dimensions instead of four dimensional space-time. One is that it would allow one to understand why a proton and an election have different masses even though the absolute magnitude … Read more
We have shown through the this blog and its companion book “The Reality of the Fourth spatial dimension” there are would be many theoretical advantages to defining the universe in terms of four *spatial* dimensions instead of four dimensional space-time. One is that it would allow to understand why it is not necessary to assume there … Read more
We have postulated throughout this blog that one can derive all the forces of nature by extrapolating the laws governing a three-dimensional environment to one made up of four *spatial* dimensions. If so one should be able to derive the strong force in those terms. The strong force, also known as the strong interaction, is the … Read more