or is the answer in the solution. The answer may seem obvious to many however, in science, one must be careful to look both ways. If one defines science only as a predictor of what we observe then the solution is in the answer however, if one defines its purpose as understanding why we observe … Read more
Today’s scientists can make extremely accurate quantitative predictions of most experimental observations based on two theories. The first or Quantum Mechanics makes extremely accurate predictions regarding the microscopic quantum mechanical properties of energy/mass while the second, the “General Theory of Relativity” makes extremely accurate predictions regarding the macroscopic properties of a gravitational field. However, these … Read more
We have and will show throughout this blog and its companion book “The Reality of the Fourth *Spatial* Dimension” observations of our environment suggest that space is composed of a continuous non-quantized field of energy/mass. One of them is that it would give us a definition of what space is that is more consistent with … Read more
In an earlier article “The role of Imagination“ Aug. 27, 2007 it was shown why a theoretical model of the universe should be based on a combination of observations, experiences and imagination. The reason why can be understood by examining how an architect designs a building. For example, when an architect imagines a new building … Read more
My name is Jeff and I would like to share my thoughts with you regarding ”The State of our understanding of the universe.” In Thomas S. Kuhn’s book "The Structure of Scientific Revolution" he documents the doubts that precipitate a paradigm change in scientific thought. For example, even though one could still make accurate predictions … Read more