Quantum mechanics and Einstein’s theories of have been the most successful scientific theories of modern times however; attempts to unify them and define “A Theory of Everything” have been unsuccessful. This is because there exists an incompatibility between the microscopic universe described by quantum mechanics and the macroscopic universe described by Einstein’s theories regarding the … Read more
or should observations define mathematics? Presently physicists use two different methods to quantify our understanding of the universe. The first or traditional method is to allow observations to define mathematics. In other words, they observed how the components of their environment interact and based on those observations derive equations that could explain those interactions. For … Read more
We have and will shown throughout this blog and its companion book “The Reality of the Fourth *Spatial* Dimension” there are many advantages to assuming space is composed of four *spatial* dimensions instead of four dimensional space time. One is that is that it gives one the ability to derive a theoretical link between the quantum … Read more
We have shown throughout this blog observations of our environment suggest the universe may be composed of four *spatial* dimensions instead of four-dimensional space-time. The observation that the energy contained in systems is related to distance not time is one of them. For example, the potential energy per unit volume of water in a dam is … Read more
How should we define reality? This question is especially relevant for the scientists who struggle on a daily basis to help us understand the "inner" reality of our universe. Some define it based on a quantitative mathematical analysis of observations. For example, Quantum mechanics defines the "reality" or state of a quantum system in terms … Read more