The Geometry of Dark energy

We have shown throughout this blog and its companion book “The Reality of the Fourth *Spatial* Dimension” there are many theoretical advantages to defining the universe in terms of four *spatial* dimensions instead of four-dimensional space-time. One is that it would allow one to derive a mechanism responsible for Dark Energy by extrapolating the laws … Read more

Gravity in four *spatial* dimensions

The article “Defining potential and kinetic energy?” Nov 26, 2007 showed it is possible to derive causality of all the forces of nature including gravity in terms of a curvature or displacement in a “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension. However, some believe that gravitational forces because of … Read more

Spaceship Spitzer and the black hole

It should be remember both sides of most stories have a lesson. For example, many sci-fi writers use the fact that the gravitational force of a black hole is so intense that nothing can escape from its “clutches” to develop their story lines.  However, many of them fail to point out the other side of … Read more

Dark energy: the cosmological constant

We have shown throughout this blog and its companion book “The Reality of the Fourth *Spatial* Dimension” observations of our environment suggest the universe is composed of four *spatial* dimensions rather than four-dimensional space-time as is suggested by Einstein’s theories. The recent discovery of Dark Energy is one of those observations. As Alexey Vikhlinin of the … Read more

Black holes: Just two numbers is all you need

We have shown though out this blog observations of our environment suggest that space is composed of a continuous non-quantized field of energy/mass. The observation that one can completely define a black hole in terms of just two numbers; its mass and spin is one of them. The video to the right prepared by the Chandra … Read more