|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why do a proton and an election have different masses even though the absolute magnitude of their charge is the same?
The answer to this question can be found in terms of energy "gradients" in a "surface" of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension caused by the charges of the proton and electron.
Chapter one postulated a volume of space is composed of four *spatial* dimensions and a continuous non-quantized form of mass.
Chapter thirteen will derive the polarity and absolute magnitude of the unit electric charge of a proton and electron in terms of energy "gradients" in a "surface" of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension.
The positive charge of a proton and will be derived in terms of an energy gradient in a "surface" of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension. While the negative the charge of an electron will be derived in terms of oppositely directed an energy "gradient" in a "surface" of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension
Chapter Ten will define how these energy "gradients" in a "surface" of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension effect the density of a continuous non-quantized mass component of space. It will show that they would affect its similar to the way energy or pressure gradients called high and low pressure areas in the earth's atmosphere effect the density of air.
In a high-pressure area, the energy of air molecules is directed downward towards the surface of the earth. This results in the density of the air molecules at the apex of a high-pressure area to be greater than the density of the air molecules in the volume of air adjacent to the apex of a high-pressure area.
Conversely, in a low-pressure area the energy of the air molecules is directed upward away form the surface of the earth. This result in the density of the air molecules at the apex of a low-pressure area to be less than the density of the air molecules in the volume of air adjacent to the apex of a low-pressure area.
This means density of the air molecules will be greater at the apex of a high-pressure area than at the apex of a low-pressure area even though the absolute value of the total energy the air molecules are equal.
A similar effect would occur in space with respect to the density of a continuous non-quantized form of mass.
In a dimensional “high-energy volume” associated with the positive charge of a proton, the energy of the continuous non-quantized mass component of space would be directed “downward” with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension, towards the “surface” of a three-dimension space manifold. This would result in the density of the continuous non-quantized mass component of space at the apex of a dimensional “high-energy volume” to be greater than the density of the continuous non-quantized form of mass in the volume of space adjacent to the apex of the dimensional “high-energy volume”.
This is analogous to how the air molecules at the apex of a high-pressure area in the earth's atmosphere would be denser than the air molecules in the volume of air adjacent to the apex of a high-pressure area.
Conversely In a dimensional “low-energy volume” associated with the negative charge of an electron, the energy of the continuous non-quantized mass component of space would be directed “upward” with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension, away form the “surface” of a three-dimension space manifold. This results in the density of the continuous non-quantized mass component of space at the apex of a dimensional “low-energy volume” to be less than the density of the continuous non-quantized form of mass in the volume of space adjacent to the apex of the dimensional “low-energy volume”.
This is analogous to how the air molecules at the apex of a low-pressure area would be less dense than air molecules in the volume of air adjacent to the apex of a low-pressure area.
Therefore the density of a continuous non-quantized form of mass will be greater at the apex of a dimensional "high-energy volume" than at the apex of dimensional "low-energy volume" even though the absolute value of their electrical energies associated with both a dimensional "high and low energy volumes" are equal. This is true for the same reason the density of the air molecules is greater at the apex of a high-pressure area than a low-pressure area even though the absolute values of the energies are equal.
Chapter twelve will shown that the mass of a particle or object is dependent on the density or concentration of a continuous non-quantized form of mass contained in the volume of that particle or object.
Therefore the relative mass of a proton will be greater that the mass of an electron even though the absolute magnitude of their charge is the same because the density of the continuous non-quantized form of mass is greater in the volume occupied by a proton than an electron.
“The
universe's most powerful enabling tool is
not knowledge or understanding
but
imagination"
Jeffrey O'Callaghan