|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Imagineer's Chronicles:
A theoretical blog
Chapter Thirteen
Chapter one postulated space is composed of a continuous non-quantized form of mass and four *spatial* dimensions instead of four-dimensional space-time.
Chapter two derived the properties of all particles including the proton and electron in terms of a resonant system formed in a continuous non-quantized form of mass.
Chapter nine defined the electrical potential of the unit positive or negative charge of a proton and electron in terms of displacements in a "surface" of a three-dimensional space manifold space manifold with respect to a fourth spatial dimension. Additionally it showed the polarity of a charge is determine by the direction of the displacement with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension in a "surface" of a three-dimensional manifold.
However this means the absolute magnitude of the "displacements" in a "surface" of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension will be identical because the absolute value of the energy of unit charges are identical.
The mechanism responsible for generating a "displacement" in "surfaces" of a three-dimensional space manifold was define in Chapter twelve where it was shown that the energy released when mass is converted to energy, "expands" "towards" a fourth *spatial* dimension. This results in the formation of pressure "gradients" on a "surface" of a three-dimensional space manifold that have similarities to the pressure gradients associated with high and low pressure areas on the earth's surface.
In a high-pressure area, the energy of air molecules is directed downward towards the surface of the earth. This results in the density of the air molecules at the apex of a high-pressure area to be greater than the density of the air molecules in the volume of air adjacent to the apex of a high-pressure area.
Conversely, in a low-pressure area the energy of the air molecules is directed upward away from the surface of the earth. This result in the density of the air molecules at the apex of a low-pressure area to be less than the density of the air molecules in the volume of air adjacent to the apex of a low-pressure area.
However, the same effects would occur in the continuous non-quantized mass component of space that define the resonant system and the mass a proton and electron in Chapter two.
In other words, the mass of a proton could be interpreted as being the result downward movement of a "surface" of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension. This would result in the density of the continuous non-quantized mass component of space to be relatively denser with respect to what it would be if that "surface" had moved in an upward direction with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension.
While the mass of an electron could be defined as being the result of an upward movement of a "surface" of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension. This would result in the density of a continuous non-quantized mass component of space to be relatively less dense with respect to what it would be if that "surface" had moved in a downward direction with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension.
Since as mentioned earlier Chapter two derived a particle in terms of a resonant system in a continuous non-quantized form of mass, a proton should be relatively more massive that an electron because the density of its non-quantized mass component would greater than that of a electron even though the absolute magnitude of the displacements in a "surface" of a three-dimensional space manifold is the same.
Therefore, the mass of a proton will be greater that the mass of a electron because the oppositely directed displacements in a "surface" of a three-dimensional space manifold associated with their unit charges results in the density of the continuous non-quantized mass component of a proton to be greater than that of an electron's.
This completes the explanation of why the relative masses of a proton and electron are different despite the fact that the absolute value of their charge.
This cannot be down in terms of a universe consisting of four dimensional space-time because time can only move or be displace in one direction forward while a spatial dimension can be displaced in two, up and down or backwards and forwards.
The universe's
most powerful enabling tool is not
knowledge or understanding but
imagination
because it extends the reality of
one's environment.""
Copyright 1995 Jeffrey O'Callaghan