-
Email An Imagineer
Blog Search
Loading...My name is Jeff and I would like to share my thoughts with you regarding ”The State of the universe.”
Presently, many scientists based their theoretical predications regarding the "State" of universe on rigorous mathematical modeling.
Unfortunately, I’m not sure the answer to the question as to why the universe appears the way it does can be unequivocally verified in that manner.
Suppose someone asks you to devise a mathematical model explaining why there are two apples on a table in an adjacent dark room. After turning on the lights you devise a mathematical model saying originally there were four apples and two were taken away.
However, you could also devise a mathematical model base on the assumption that there were originally six apples on the table and four were taken away.
Both of them give the correct end result as to the number of apples on the table however, they both cannot be right.
The only way to verify which mathematical model correctly defines reality is by observing how many were on the table before the lights were turn on.
This is why we feel that theoretically predictions as to why the "State" of our universe is what it is should not be based only on the end result of mathematical modeling but on observing how its components interact.
(Were there six or four apples on the table before the light was turn on?)
In the upcoming weeks and months we will shown how scientists can look into the "darkness" of our universe and to see how its components interact to verify their mathematical models.
Later Jeff
"The universe’s most powerful enabling tool is not
knowledge or understanding but imagination
because it extends the reality of
ones environment."
Copyright 2007 Jeffrey O’Callaghan
(In a PDF format)
absolutely understanding locality with a practical message
save up this terrific resource.