We have shown throughout “The Imagineer’s Chronicles” and its companion book “The Reality of the Fourth *Spatial* Dimension” observations of our environment suggest the universe is made up of a continuous non-quantized field of energy/mass and four *spatial* dimensions instead of four-dimensional space-time.

However, many scientists assume all energy/mass is quantized in part because of the success modern quantum theories have had in predicting and explaining its observable properties.

Quantum Mechanics

But as was pointed out in the article “What is Dark Matter?” Sept 10, 2007 observations of our environment would seem to contradict that assumption.

However, what is even more damaging to it is the fact the existence of a continuous non-quantized field energy/mass would enable theoreticians to derive its quantum properties by extrapolating the laws of Classical Newtonian resonance in three-dimensional environment to a fourth *spatial* dimensions.

In an earlier article “The Photon: a matter wave?” Sept 27, 2007 it was shown the electromagnetic wave characteristics of a photon could be explained and predicted in terms of a matter wave in a continuous non-quantized field of energy/mass moving on a “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension.

However, it can be shown this matter wave would generate a classically resonating system or “structure” in space which is responsible for its quantum properties. 

There are four conditions required for resonance to occur in a classical Newtonian environment, an object, or substance with a natural frequency, a forcing function at the same frequency as the natural frequency, the lack of a damping frequency and the ability for the substance to oscillate spatial.

The existence of four *spatial* dimensions would give a continuous non-quantized field of energy/mass (the substance) the ability to oscillate spatially on a “surface” between a third and fourth *spatial* dimensions thereby fulfilling one of the requirements for classical resonance to occur.

These oscillations would be caused by an event such as the decay of a subatomic particle or the shifting of an electron in an atomic orbital.  This would force the “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension to oscillate with the frequency associated with the energy of that event.

Therefore, these oscillations in a continuous non-quantized field of energy/mass, would meet the requirements mentioned above for the formation of a resonant system or “structure” in space. 

Observations of a three-dimensional environment show the energy associated with resonant system can only take on the incremental or discreet values associated with a fundamental or a harmonic of the  fundamental frequency of its environment.

Similarly the energy associated with resonant systems in four *spatial* dimensions could only take on the incremental or discreet values associated a fundamental or a harmonic of the fundamental frequency of its environment.

These resonant systems in four *spatial* dimensions are responsible for the incremental or discreet energy associated with quantum mechanical systems.

(In a latter article “The geometry of quarks” it will be shown how and why quarks join together to form these resonant systems in terms of the geometry of four *spatial* dimensions.)

The only way to dampen the frequency of a classically resonating system is to add or remove energy from it, which results in changing the characteristics of that system. 

Additionally the energy in a classically resonating system is, as mentioned earlier is discontinuous and can only take on the discrete values associated with its fundamental or harmonic of its fundamental frequency.

However, these properties of a classically resonating system are the same as those found in a particle in that they are made up of discreet or discontinuous packets of energy/mass and when energy is either added or removed from it, its characteristics changed. 

It also allows one to define a mechanism, in terms of classical mechanics for the uncertainty principal of Quantum Mechanics which states that certain pairs of physical properties, like position and momentum, cannot both be known to arbitrary precision.  That is, the more precisely one property is known, the less precisely the other can be known.

Classical wave mechanics tells us a wave’s energy is instantaneously constant at its peaks and valleys or the 90 and 270-degree points as its slope changes from positive to negative while it changes most rapidly at the 180 and 360-degree points.

Therefore, the precise position of a particle could be only be defined at the peaks and valleys of the matter wave because those points are the only places where its energy or “position” is stationary with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension.  Whereas its precise momentum would only be definable with respect to where the energy change or velocity is maximum at the 180 and 360-degree points of that wave.  All points in between would only be definable in terms of a combination of its momentum and position.

However, to measure the exact position of a particle one would have to divert or drain all of the energy at the 90 or 270-degree points to the observing instrument leaving no energy associated with its momentum to be observed by another instrument.  Therefore, if one was able to determine precise position of a particle he or she could not determine anything about its momentum.  Similarly, to measure its precise momentum one would have to divert all of the energy at the 180 or 360 point of the wave to the observing instrument leaving none of its position information left to for an instrument which was attempting to measure it.  Therefore, if one was able to determine a particles exact momentum one could not say anything about its position.

The reason we observe a particle as a point mass instead of an extended object or wave is because, as mentioned earlier its energy is propagated in quantized resonant systems. Therefore, when we observe the energy continued in its wave function, whether it be related to its position or momentum it will appear to come from a specific point in space.

This would be analogous to how we observe the extended volume of water in a sink to originate from the very confined area of the drain when we pull the plug.

As mentioned earlier, all points in-between are a dynamic combination of both position and momentum.  Therefore, the degree of accuracy one chooses to measure one will affect the other. 

For example, if one wants to measure the position of a particle to within a certain predefined distance “m” its wave energy or momentum will have to pass through that opening.  However, Classical Wave Mechanics tells us that as we reduce the error in our measurement by decreasing that predefine distance interference will cause its energy or momentum to be smeared our over a wider area.  Similarly, to measure its momentum “m”kg / s one must observe a portion the wavelength associated with its momentum.  However, Classical wave mechanics tell us we must observe a larger portion of its wavelength to increase the accuracy of the measurement of its energy or momentum.  But this means that the accuracy of its position will be reduced because the boundaries determining its position within the measurement field are greater.

However, because of the dynamic interaction between the position and moment component of the matter wave responsible for generating the resonant system associated with a particle defined above the change or uncertainty of one with respect would be defined by the product of those factors or m^2 kg / s.

Another way of looking at this would be to allow a photon or a particle to pass through a slit and observe where it struck a screen on the other side.  One could get a more precise measurement of its position by narrowing the slit however classical wave mechanics tell us this will increase the interference of the wave properties associated with its resonant structure.  However this will cause the interference pattern defining its momentum to become more spread out and therefore make it more difficult to accurately determine its value.

Therefore, Classical wave mechanics, when extrapolated to a fourth *spatial* dimension tell us the more precisely the momentum of a particle is known, the less precisely its position can be known while the more precisely its position is known, the less precisely its momentum can be determined if one assumes, as we have done here that the quantum mechanical properties energy/mass are a result of a resonant system formed by a matter wave on a “surface” of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension

This shows that it is possible to logically and consistently explain and predict the quantum mechanical properties energy/mass in a microscopic environment in terms of a resonate system in a continuous non-quantized field of energy/mass and four *spatial* dimensions which obeys the laws of classical resonance in a macroscopic environment.

These arguments would not be valid in a universe consisting of four dimensional space-time because time is only observed to move in one direction forward and therefore would not support the transverse or bi-directional or oscillatory movement required to establish a classically resonating system

Later Jeff

Copyright Jeffrey O’Callaghan 2007

 

The Imagineer’s
Chronicles
Vol. 4 — 2013


Paperback
$13.29
Ebook
$7.99

The Imagineer’s
Chronicles
Vol. 3 — 2012

Paperback
$10.96
Ebook
$6.55

The Reality
of the Fourth Spatial Dimension

Paperback
$9.77
Ebook
$6.24

The Imagineer’s
Chronicles

Vol. 2 — 2011

Paperback
$8.32
Ebook
$6.57

The Imagineer’s
Chronicles
2007 thru 2010

Paperback
$14.97
Ebook
$7.82



9 Comments to “Why is energy/mass quantized?”


  1. atomic kitten — January 3, 2008 @ 10:39 am

    atomic kitten…

    Man i just love your blog, keep the cool posts comin…..

  2. Эльвира — December 15, 2008 @ 5:38 pm

    я люблю все ваши слова..

  3. johnny — January 1, 2009 @ 11:52 pm

    Thanks for good post

  4. Stone — January 18, 2009 @ 5:04 pm

    wonderful think))

  5. What — January 20, 2009 @ 6:13 pm

    It’s difficult to udnerstand..

  6. Caffeine For Fat Loss — February 4, 2009 @ 1:18 pm

    Nice site. I’m glad I found it. All the best, Jaron

  7. GarykPatton — June 15, 2009 @ 10:41 pm

    You know so many interesting infomation. You might be very wise. I like such people. Don’t stop writing.

  8. written communication course — December 11, 2010 @ 6:09 am

    Congratulations on having 1 of the most sophisticated blogs Ive come throughout in some time! Its just incredible how substantially you can take away from one thing simply because of how visually beautiful it is. Youve put together a excellent blog space –great graphics, videos, layout. This is undoubtedly a must-see blog!
    listening skills training course

  9. imatez.com — August 16, 2014 @ 7:59 am

    imatez.com

    Why is energy/mass quantized? | The Imagineer’s Chronicles



Write a comment


Name




 

    
The Imagineer's Chronicles is based on WordPress platform, RSS tech , RSS comments design by Gx3.