We have shown throughout "The Imagineer’s Chronicles" and its companion book "The Reality of the Fourth *Spatial* Dimension" there would be many theoretical advantages to space in terms four *spatial* dimensions instead of four-dimensional space-time.

One of them is that it would allow for the understanding of why some particles are stable while others are not in terms of their geometry.

Einstein gave us the ability to redefine his space time universe when he used the equation E=mc^2 and the constant velocity of light to define the geometric properties of mass in a space-time universe.  This is because that provided a method of converting a unit of time in a space-time to unit of space in four *spatial* dimensions.  Additionally because the velocity of light is constant he also defined a one to one quantitative correspondence between his space-time universe and one made up of four *spatial* dimensions.

This would allow one to understand the quantum mechanical properties of a particle as was done in the article "Why is energy/mass quantized?" Oct. 4, 2007  by extrapolating the laws classical resonance in a three-dimensional environment to a matter wave on a "surface" of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension.

Nuclear particles involved in nuclear reactions & Stability of nuclei

Briefly it showed the four conditions required for resonance to occur in a classical environment, an object, or substance with a natural frequency, a forcing function at the same frequency as the natural frequency, the lack of a damping frequency and the ability for the substance to oscillate spatial would be meet by a matter wave in four spatial dimensions.

The existence of four *spatial* dimensions would give a matter wave the ability to oscillate spatially on a "surface" between a third and fourth *spatial* dimensions thereby fulfilling one of the requirements for classical resonance to occur.

These oscillations would be caused by an event such as the decay of a subatomic particle or the shifting of an electron in an atomic orbital.  This would force the "surface" of a three-dimensional space manifold with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension to oscillate with the frequency associated with the energy of that event.

The oscillations caused by such an event would serve as forcing function allowing a resonant system or "structure" to be established in four *spatial* dimensions.

Classical mechanics tells us the energy of a resonant system can only take on the discrete or quantized values associated with its resonant or a harmonic of its resonant frequency

Therefore the discrete or quantized energy of resonant systems in a continuous form of energy/mass would be responsible for the discrete quantized quantum mechanical properties of particles.

However, it did not explain how the boundaries of a particle’s resonant structure are defined.

In classical physics, a point on the two-dimensional surface of paper is confined to that surface.  However, that surface can oscillate up or down with respect to three-dimensional space. 

Similarly an object occupying a volume of three-dimensional space would be confined to it however, it could, similar to the surface of the paper oscillate "up" or "down" with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension.

The confinement of the "upward" and "downward" oscillations of a three-dimension volume with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension is what defines the geometric boundaries of the resonant system associated with a particle in the article "Why is energy/mass quantized?"

However, it is not possible to define its boundaries in a space-time environment because it time component represent movement though space therefore it cannot define a discrete position required for the boundary condition of these stable or static resonate systems.

It is also possible to derive why some particles are stable while others are not by extrapolating the properties of classical resonance to a fourth *spatial* dimensions.

To be stable a classically resonating system must have the energy associated with the discrete values of its fundamental frequency or an integral multiple of its resonant environment.  If it does not it will either lose gain energy from its until it’s is oscillating at that frequency.

Therefore, a stable particle would be one whose three-dimensional volume is oscillating with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension at the fundamental or harmonic of the resonant frequency associated with that volume. 

An unstable particle would be one whose three-dimensional volume is oscillating with respect to a fourth *spatial* dimension at a frequency other than the one associated with the energy of its resonant environment.  Similar to resonant systems in a classical environment, these particles will decay by losing or gaining energy from their environment until they have the stable resonant structure associated with either the fundamental or harmonic of the resonant frequency associated with their volume.

This shows why one can define the stability or instability of a particle in terms of its geometry by extrapolating the properties of a classically resonating system in three-dimensional space to a fourth *spatial* dimension.

Later Jeff

Copyright Jeffrey O’Callaghan 2009


Anthology of
The Imagineer’s Chronicles
Vol. 1 thru 5

2007 thru 2014




The Reality
of the Fourth




The Imagineer’s
Vol. 5 — 2014



The Imagineer’s
Vol. 4 — 2013


The Imagineer’s
Vol. 3 — 2012



The Imagineer’s

Vol. 2 — 2011




The Imagineer’s
2007 thru 2010



10 Comments to “The geometry of particle stability”

  1. Debt Settlement — April 21, 2010 @ 3:40 pm

    Sorry for my bad english. Thank you so much for your good post. Your post helped me in my college assignment, If you can provide me more details please email me.

  2. toronto sun newspaper — January 21, 2011 @ 1:08 pm

    I usually don’t post in Blogs but your blog forced me to, amazing work.. beautiful …

  3. daily progress — January 23, 2011 @ 12:42 am

    I am not a person who is easily delighted but I have to say your work blew me away. So much ideas and relevant detaisl that you put into it made me see your point of view. Thanks for communicating your reasonable inputs.

  4. zip code finder — January 24, 2011 @ 5:07 pm

    Hey I just wanted to say that I really enjoyed reading your blog. You have good views, Keep up the good informative info :)

  5. google calculator — January 25, 2011 @ 4:42 am

    Pretty insightful post. Never thought that it was this simple after all. I had spent a good deal of my time looking for someone to explain this subject clearly and you’re the only one that ever did that. Kudos to you! Keep it up

  6. mississauga part time jobs — March 12, 2011 @ 7:33 am

    I’ve been visiting your blog for a while now and I always find a gem in your new posts. Thanks for sharing.

  7. payday loans online direct lenders — June 12, 2011 @ 6:03 am

    Hello, I found your blog in a new directory of blogs. I don’t learn how your site came up, must have been a typo. Your website looks good, use a nice day.

  8. Rolande Penders — June 3, 2012 @ 10:55 am

    Hiya, I’m really glad I’ve found this info. Today bloggers publish just about gossips and internet and this is actually frustrating. A good site with exciting content, that is what I need. Thanks for keeping this web-site, I will be visiting it. Do you do newsletters? Can not find it.

  9. theimagi — June 3, 2012 @ 3:43 pm

    We don’t do newsletters however you can receive a list of our articles by clicking on the news feed button in the right hand menu bar

  10. hire wedding bands edinburgh — November 13, 2012 @ 7:10 am

    It’s arduous to seek out educated individuals on this subject, however you sound like you know what you’re talking about! Thanks

Write a comment

You need tologin.

The Imagineer's Chronicles is based on WordPress platform, RSS tech , RSS comments design by Gx3.